Phil Discussion Question 5

To Torture or not to TortureFirst , the hard facts : Torturing the create unforesightful girl would seduce - meaning thousands of lives or by chance to a greater extent could be saved . Not torturesome the girl would operate to the bomb s detonation , decimating an built-in city . Based on these facts , the statistics show that the act of torturing a little girl that could permanently and irreversibly footing her life forever is against the lives of a population the size of a large city . looking at at it mathematically , it is supposed to be a no-brainer . Sacrifices charter to be do in to pr veritable(a)t a study catastrophe , even if the price is the agony of an innocent little girl .

As saving grace , the scenario does non detect that the girl would be killed , so actually , it is her torture against lives , not her life against thousands , or moreEven if the scenario express that the little girl would be killed in exchange for the randomness her father is holding (which the scenario as trustworthys would work in defusing the bomb , I would still beak the lives of thousands over the life of 1 girl . While torture is an evil act , so too is terrorism - a dilemma that I m sure counter-terrorism agents face on their duties . on that point is a saying that you can t fire with fire - a treat form of address can t be reversed by doing another wrong deed . Looking at devotion technically , I m not supposed to torture the little gi rl , only if my conscience suggests that...! If you want to get a full essay, redact it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper